|
Above Left: The focuser that was originally provided with our own and with all earlier production Unitron Model 142 telescopes. This remains in our collection (56,233 bytes).
Click on image to see enlarged view (134,978 bytes)
Above Right: De-Luxe Focuser, ordered by the original owner and installed by him onto our Model 142 telescope, shown with drawtube extended and with the extension installed.
Note both setscrew locks. This is the type of focuser provided with the Unitron Model 145 telescopes (60,799 bytes).
Click on image to see enlarged view (213,237 bytes)
One final observation; when a customer ordered an upgrade focuser from Unitron then it was not always guaranteed that the focuser body would have the telescope information engraved. The original owner of this Model 142 ordered the upgrade focuser and received one with no telescope OTA information, hence unlike the original focuser shown above right that is labeled "D 75mm F 1200mm", while the De-Luxe focuser is only engraved with the UNITRON name.
Finder Telescope: this instrument was originally furnished with one 8x 30mm aperture finder telescope. The finder assembly is attached to the main telescope barrel by two brackets bolted onto the tube wall. Most telescopes that are comparatively high magnification designs are furnished with a smaller, wide field of view auxiliary telescope. With the 3 inch f/16 telescopes not being able to see any more than about 1.1 degrees field of view (about two diameters of the Moon), the finder is an essential aid to point the main telescope onto the target quickly. The original owner of this telescope realized that particularly when operating with a German Equatorial style mount, it is helpful to have at least one additional Finder telescope attached along the area opposite of the original 8x 32mm finder. So he ordered not only one optional larger 10x 40mm finder, he also ordered a second auxiliary 8x 30 finder.
Each cast aluminum bracket has three support screws used to tip and tilt the finder so that it is aligned parallel to the line of sight of the main telescope. To focus the finder pointed the telescope onto an easy to find distant object, while looking through the finder eyepiece rotate the eyepiece to focus the dual line crosshairs. Finally, focus the finder onto the distant object by pushing in or pulling out the eyepiece and drawtube assembly to reach focus.
Mount Head and Tripod: among the attractive aspects of the entire product line was the value they provided with their attention to precision, rigidity, and appearance in the design of the mounts that support the telescope optical tube assembly. In these areas the Nihon Seiko products stood alone for decades. Nihon Seiko made German Equatorial Mounts and Altazimuth Mounts so most telescopes were offered in the customers choice of either mount. The mount heads are built upon machined aluminum castings that incorporated finely crafted roller bearings, worm and main gears, and other components of stainless steel. Customer who preferred a telescope dedicated to astronomy would not only have the choice of the telescope on a German Equatorial Mount, but also had the choice of more sophisticated Photographic Equatorial ensembles. The larger telescopes can barely be accommodated, even for static display without special consideration of their height. An even more impressive memory is seeing a large Unitron telescope set up and with an amazing array of finder/guide/auxiliary telescopes attached to (almost smothering) the primary telescope.
Right: Unitron Model 142 Mount Head Right Ascension axis main and worm gears set, roller bearings, shaft, and other components (49,348 bytes).
Competing systems then marketed to the consumer tended to incorporate less finely made gears sets, fewer precision bearings (if any at all), and their tripods tended to lack the rigidity of the products. While the Nihon Seiko mounts incorporated fine geared smooth controls, precise bearings, and clutches to allow precise manual control motions (up or down, left or right) of the mounts. One could set up the Nihon Seiko mount quickly, then track a planet across sky observing at high magnifications smoothly and with no jitter or point the telescope onto a distant ship and follow it across the horizon.
The equatorial telescopes were offered with a sturdy and attractive wood field tripod, these are fixed in their angle of leg spread. The tripod provided with the mounts made to support the telescopes of up to 3 inch were articulated, made to fold about in half for more compact stowage as is that of the Unitron Model 142 telescope we show. The larger 4 and 5 inch telescopes were offered with the choice of either the fixed height wood field tripod or with a metal pier for permanent installations; these legs too were provided with wood storage cases and could rival a telescope case in length overall. Later in production the tripod made to support some of late production 4 inch telescopes was made to fold in half too, similar to the storage arrangement of the smaller 3 inch tripods. The folding legs on a 4 inch Equatorial set are uncommon, this is another interesting aspect of the Model 132 telescope selected for exhibit at Company Seven. The 6 inch and larger telescopes mounts were offered only with the metal pier, there was no field tripod offered as they were not likely to be moved about.
For the customer who intended to use the telescope primarily for terrestrial applications and for casual visual astronomy then the altazimuth mount suffices. Furthermore, the altazimuth mount is simpler to set up and a less costly proposition. The altazimuth mounts were made available only with a matched portable wood field tripod. The wood tripod was intended to be folded quickly with the lower section rotating about the hinge at the middle of the leg, then rotating the lower section to store it neatly in between the upper leg spans. When extended the legs were supported in their proper disposition by means of a metal brace attached to the top of the lower section of each leg.
The mount included with the Model 142 telescope set is a German Equatorial mount with wood field tripod. Some of the details include the Setting Circles, and Clock Drive option:
Right Ascension Setting Circle: Resolution to 1 Arc Minute |
Declination Setting Circle: Resolution to 5 Arc Minute. Note the Decl. Axis lock/tensioning nut at the bottom, just above the Counterweight Shaft locking nut |
Clock Drive Motor, Linkage and Support Tray
|
Above: Unitron Model 142 mount details as it arrived at Company Seven; even after decades it inspires confidence and pride of ownership.
Click on images to see enlarged views (in order 187,530 then 185,918 and 199,956 bytes).
Assembly of the Mount and Telescope:
Extend the tripod leg extension sections, then attach the legs brace/accessory tray to keep the legs from accidentally spreading out under load. The tips of the tripod legs are of sharp and pointed steel, these will readily dig into the ground and stand fast. However, when setting up on very soft or wet ground Company Seven recommends placing a disc of plywood on the ground and under each leg tip to spread the load around a larger area. This will reduce the likelihood of the tripod settling in the ground, or even freezing into mud if the temperature drops through the observing session. For display indoors an optional caster pad under each tripod leg tip can protect your flooring.
We recommend setting up on level ground, alternatively you may put some block(s) under one or more legs to better level the set. Many owners employ a bubble level set onto or permanently affixed to the mount head, this to help judge when leveling. Next attach the mount head onto the tripod.
The Counterweight Shaft of the Unitron 142 mount head is an eleven (11) inch long fully machined bar, threaded ⅝ inch - 11 TPI (thread per inch) along its entire length. Of this about two inches threads into the female threaded socket of the mount head Declination Axis, leaving about nine inches extending from the mount to accommodate thread-on counterweights. Thread the Counterweight Shaft onto the mount, then secure the shaft in place by tightening the sole ⅝ inch - 11 nut against the Declination Shaft housing threads, this is at the point where the shaft enters the mount socket. Then thread the weights onto the shaft leaving the mount in a shaft-heavy configuration, at least to start off. Now the mount is ready for the telescope. This type of threaded rod is sold at most hardware stores, so it a simple matter to replace the shaft should you come across an incomplete Unitron mount. Even if you lack the original Unitron threaded counterweights you could drill a third-party counterweight to fit the shaft, then attach ⅝ inch - 11 nuts and washers above and below the slide-on counterweight.
Attach the telescope optical tube mounting collar onto the mount saddle (the topmost flat section of the mount), attaching this by means of two hand knobs. The telescope was set onto the collar and slid towards the front or back along the saddle until the optical tube reaches a nominal working balance point. Then swing the collar upper half down and over the telescope, secure the collar upper half to the lower half in place with the hand knob at the side of the collar.
The UNIBALANCE is a counter weight set made to balance the telescope along its Declination Axis, this resembles those sets historically provided for many refractors including those made by Carl Zeiss Jena for example. The UNIBALANCE set consists of a 13-¼ inch long x 0.3 inch (8 mm) diameter shaft with one threaded end that attach onto the fixture atop the UNICLAMP bracket. The set is provided with one sliding 337 g. (11.9 oz.) counterweight that can be locked at any position along the length of the shaft. Attach the UNIBALANCE set to the optical tube since this will facilitate changing accessories on the optical tube reducing the need to loosen the optical tube mounting collar to adjust the telescope position on the saddle.
Next loosen the clutches for Right Ascension and balance the telescope in that axis. Do the same for declination. To make fine adjustments in either axis first tighten the clutches, then turn the black hand knobs on either side of the rear of the mount head. The Right Ascension has a worm gear mechanism, so one can move the telescope throughout the RA axis with no interruptions, though care is taken to avoid binding the lengthy optical tube against the tripod. The Declination manual geared controls are spring loaded tangent style drives, and so the mount can only be moved so far by these controls without loosening the clutches to manually reposition the telescope, an unwinding the manual geared controls before resuming the tracking. When using the smaller Unitron Alt-Ax telescopes it was a simple matter while at the eyepiece to reach forward to turn these controls to track an object, but mounts such as this and for the 4 inch and larger telescopes incorporated flexible cables or steel rods to facilitate this.
Pole Aligning The Mount:
Proper operation of a German Mount requires the Right Ascension (R.A.) axis of rotation be aligned to be parallel to the axis of the Earths rotation. To achieve this at locations that you will frequent, Company Seven recommends you first level the tripod. By leveling when you first Pole Align the mount head you will not need to change the latitude setting of the mount again unless you travel north or south to other locations.
Loosen the azimuth (left to right, or longitudinal) adjustment clamp of the Nihon Seiko mount head assembly, this permits the user to smoothly rotate the assembly atop the field tripod and direct the mount head R.A. axis to point towards the Celestial North (or South) Pole. Then tighten this clamp. There is no fine adjustment mechanism to fine tune centering the mount in azimuth since the movement is smooth and can be refined easily enough.
Since this elevation adjustment motion involves working against gravity, the mount head is fitted with a latitude fine adjustment mechanism to attain a more precise pole alignment. The latitude adjustment mechanism consists of a hardened stainless steel threaded worm (male) and hexagonal sleeve (female), similar to a turnbuckle, to drive the mount head tilt up or down precisely.
Right: Model 142/145 German Mount with latitude adjustment mechanism circled (66,794 bytes). The installed set shown and circled in green accommodates operation at latitudes of between approximately 25 to 40 degrees, the shorter mechanism shown removed at right is for higher latitudes of Approx. 50 degrees.
Click on image to see enlarged view (183,869 bytes).
Adjusting the mount head tilt up or down when Pole Aligning involves first making certain the large stainless steel bolt that joins the Right Ascension axis housing to the mount head base post is adjusted just enough so that this joint may be articulated by hand but that this is not too loose either. When the mount head left the Nihon Seiko factory the nominal tensioning of this bolt would have been set. But if the mount had been used by someone doing astrophotography, or if used by someone not familiar with proper technique, then this bolt may have been tightened too tight to allow changing the latitude.
Next turn the latitude adjustment mechanism, this control can be turned by hand and is easier to do if while turning the hexagonal sleeve with one hand you gently support the telescope with your other hand doing so in a manner to reduce the load on the mount elevation bearing. The latitude adjustment mechanism has only a limited span of travel, this is dependent on the lengths of the two threaded components. So when the mount was sold new the distributor provided the appropriate mechanism for the users intended latitude. This was fine if you lived in one latitude range such as along the northern states of the USA or in the United Kingdom for example. But if you relocated to Florida for example, then you would need to change the assembly with one that is suitable for the lower latitude.
If you acquire a mount that is lacking the correct Nihon Seiko latitude adjustment components, a suitable replacement may be fabricated by a machinist with some guidance and using the original as a conceptual model. Alternatively one or two tripod legs can be shimmed, a wood block can suffice, to allow the mount head to reach the optimum tilt in latitude - of course insure this is not so excessive a tilt that the set becomes unstable.
The latitude adjustment mechanism is not designed for use near the Equator, nor could the mount be aligned in Arctic regions owing to interference between the Right Ascension setting circle and the mount head post.
Finally, the Setting Circles are indexed either by using reference stars or by other techniques.
Owing to the long length of the telescopes and fixed height of the tripod legs, people learned to work around the telescope standing when looking towards the horizon and possibly sitting on a low seat when observing objects overhead. This posed no major issues for most people and children when using telescopes of 3 inch and smaller. But by the time the design was scaled up to a 4 inch model, then when observing objects low in the distance shorter people would need to use a short step ladder to reach the eyepiece. But that is all part of the fun of having such a long optical tube to work around.
Eyepieces: a telescope is a light funnel that gathers light and forms one image. Eyepieces are basically magnifying lenses that are attached onto the focuser of a telescope to enlarge the image. The working magnification, numerous qualities of the image (field of view, clarity, degree of chromatism, etc.), and the comfort of the user while observing (eye relief) are determined not only by the qualities of the telescope but also of the eyepiece.
Right: five eyepieces provided with our Model 142 alongside two 2 inch diameter eyepieces for comparison in our display (95,568 bytes)
Click on the image to see enlarged view (100,004 bytes).
The eyepieces designs provided by Unitron included the Ramsden (sometimes termed Modified Achromatic), a design formulated in 1782 by scientific instrument maker Jesse Ramsden. The Kellner (designed b Carl Kellner in 1849) is another popular choice, basically an improved Ramsden. Both the Ramsden and Kellner are economical general purpose eyepieces that when made well satisfy most novices however, the Ramsden introduced perceptible false color that some people may wrongly attribute to originating in the telescope objective lens. Given the f/15 to f/16 focal ratios of the Unitron telescopes makes less demands of an eyepiece than faster designs, these eyepieces were suitable for most amateurs. For the more demanding clients there were optional Orthoscopic (design devised by Ernst Abbe of Carl Zeiss in 1880) eyepieces available too. The Orthoscopic is highly regarded for its uniformity of magnification (lacking distortion) across the entire field of view when used with systems of f/7 and longer. When made well the Orthoscopic provides superb contrast and definition thereby making it an optimum choice for high resolution applications including observing the planets, double stars, the Moon, etc.
The UNITRON 1.6, 2.4, and 3 inch telescopes could accept interchangeable eyepieces of either 0.965 or 1.25 inch in diameter, although the standard four eyepieces provided with the set were 0.965. The 0.965 inch standard was referred to as the “Japanese” standard in some literature however, this standard was typical for telescopes made in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and predated Japans involvement in optics.
When originally introduced the 60mm Altazimuth telescopes were sold for $125 and furnished with two 0.965 inch diameter eyepieces: the 9mm and 18mm. The standard drawtube tip fitting would accommodate 0.965 accessories (diagonal, etc.). By 1956 most of the telescope sets, including the 3 inch model shown here, were provided with a set of four eyepieces as standard equipment: 9mm Achromatized Symmetrical, 12.5mm Kellner, 18mm Kellner, and 25mm Huygens. Telescopes equipped (as this one) with the UNIHEX or with a 1.25" diagonal would accept one optional 1.25 inch eyepiece. By 1963 Unitron included a new Achromatic Amplifier with the telescopes, this is a negative or Barlow lens that could be attached onto the barrel of the UNIHEX or the standard extension sleeve. When installed the Achromatic Amplifier increased the effective focal length of the telescope by a factor of about 2x, thus doubling the magnification of each eyepiece.
By the late 1980s most new amateur telescopes, even introductory models, were built to accept at least 1.25 inch diameter eyepieces. Companies including Celestron that offered “Cometron” series telescopes with 0.965 targeted to the entry level consumer found the American customer and reviewers showed disdain for the old reliable standard in favor of the larger 1.25 inch eyepieces. The more advanced amateur and professional telescopes (not that too many professional astronomers ever look through a telescope anymore) incorporate focusers that can accept the even larger 2 inch diameter eyepieces. The attraction of the larger and larger eyepieces has to do with: 1. the potential for wider fields of view, and 2. improved eye relief.
In addition to magnification and quality of the image presented, the eyepiece determines the actual field of view; the area that can be seen. The field of view most accurately can be calculated when knowing diameter of the opening within the eyepiece barrel where the telescope image plane and eyepiece planes meet (Field Stop). Company Sevens measurements of Unitron eyepieces show how the differences in maximum area that can be observed compare among the three popular eyepiece standards:
- 2 inch diameter eyepiece can show as much as 2.9x the area seen in a 1.25 inch eyepiece, or 5x the area of a 0.965 eyepiece
- 1.25 inch diameter eyepiece shows 1.7x the area of a 0.965 inch eyepiece
- 0.965 inch eyepieces can show almost two thirds the area that can be seen in 1.25, and one fifth the area that can be seen in 2 inch eyepieces
As the industry changed to 1.25 eyepieces the sources of 0.965 eyepieces (Carton Optical Industries Ltd. for example) gradually discontinued production of the older standard. By this time telescope sales at Unitron were winding down anyway so there was no need to source new stock of the 0.965 eyepieces. By the mid 1980s Unitron offered a greater selection of 1.25 inch diameter eyepieces than they offered 0.965 inch models.
Optional eyepieces in the Unitron line from 1955 included: 0.965 - 4mm Orthoscopic, 0.965 - 5mm Orthoscopic, 0.965 - 6mm Orthoscopic, 0.965 - 7mm Achromatized Symmetrical, one 1.25 inch eyepiece the 40mm Kellner-Monochro*, and one 2 inch 60mm Kellner. While the provided focal lengths of the eyepieces never varied by much over the years the mix of models varied slightly, for example in most years the provided 25mm was a Kellner but later this was substituted for with a Ramsden. The offerings varied somewhat over the years but the choices for the larger telescopes in particular included 2 inch diameter eyepieces including their 60mm Kellner, the upscale 55mm Plossl and 32mm Erfle wide angle eyepieces. By 1985 the 2 inch offerings continued to show only one, the 60mm Kellner, being available. But by the mid 1980s none of these eyepieces could compete for the attentions of dedicated observers against superior and more versatile eyepieces by competitors, most notably Brandon and Clave as well as the innovative TeleVue Optics.
* this was a 1.25 inch diameter 40mm Kellner-Monochro eyepiece, because of this larger diameter barrel it could be employed on the 3 inch and smaller aperture telescopes only with the UNIHEX attached.
Left: One of the more interesting eyepieces ever distributed by Nihon Seiko in profile (20,747 bytes). From design in Company Sevens Archives.
Each air spaced element was treated with magnesium fluoride anti-reflection coatings to improve light throughput and to reduce the possibility of ghost images. Later production telescopes featured slightly improved multilayer antireflection (AR) coatings, usually presenting with a greenish ting. The AR coatings subdue undesired reflections, otherwise it was possible to have one brighter star reflect back and forth between eyepiece elements thus giving the misleading appearance as though there were other stars in the field of view. The curves of these lenses are so subtle that ghosting could only rarely become a concern in practice. The interior of each eyepiece barrel is painted anti-reflection black.
While the provided focal lengths of the eyepieces never varied over the years, the mix of models varied slightly. For example in most years the provided 25mm eyepiece was a Kellner design but this later this was substituted for with a simpler Ramsden design eyepiece. The telescope in Company Sevens collection was acquired with the original five 0.965 inch diameter eyepieces (described below).
Eyepieces Offered By Unitron Exhibited at Company Seven:
Notes:
• Field of View is actual field of view as calculated for our Unitron 3 inch refractor based on our eyepiece design data and testing.
• Unitron 2.4 inch 3 inch refractor telescopes could accept only 0.965 inch diameter eyepieces, or 1-1/4 inch eyepieces with the UNIHEX.
• Our Unitron 3 inch Model 142 telescope included five .965 inch eyepieces: R25mm, K18mm, K12.5mm, SYM ACH 9mm and SYM ACH 7mm.
• The ER32 eyepiece was made to either slip fit into 2 inch port of a Super UNIXEX or thread-on to the Super Focuser drawtube.
• The 55 Plössl eyepiece was made to slip fit into 2 inch port of a Super UNIXEX.
• The ER32 eyepiece was made to either slip fit into 2 inch port of a Super UNIXEX or thread-on to the Super Focuser drawtube.
• We missed adding the K.13mm eyepiece to the set for the photo shoot, sorry.
Make |
Model |
Dia. |
Mag. |
Design |
Field of View |
UNITRON |
MONOCHRO.40mm |
1.25" |
30X |
Mononchromat |
1.13° |
UNITRON |
# MONOCHRO.40mm |
1.25" |
30X |
Mononchromat |
1.13° |
UNITRON |
R25mm |
.965" |
48X |
Ramsden |
0.76° |
UNITRON |
K18mm |
.965" |
67X |
Kellner |
0.52° |
UNITRON |
K13mm |
.965" |
92X |
Kellner |
0.60° |
UNITRON |
K12.5mm |
.965" |
96X |
Kellner |
0.38° |
UNITRON |
K12mm |
.965" |
100X |
Kellner |
0.38° |
UNITRON |
SYM. ACH. 9mm |
.965" |
133X |
Achromatized Symmetrical |
0.29° |
UNITRON |
SYM. ACH. 7mm |
.965" |
171X |
Achromatized Symmetrical |
0.22° |
UNITRON |
OR 6mm |
.965" |
200X |
Orthoscopic |
0.19° |
UNITRON |
OR 4mm |
.965" |
300X |
Orthoscopic |
0.16° |
UNITRON |
K60 |
25X |
2" |
Kellner |
1.52° |
UNITRON |
55mm |
27X |
2" |
Plössl |
1.45° |
UNITRON |
ER32mm |
61X |
2" |
Erfle |
1.28° |
The Glory Days of Space and Unitron
Nihon Seiko and the distributors Unitron and Polarex were successful at promoting the refracting telescope as the vision of what an astronomical telescope should be. The telescopes were not only providing amazing views and images of the night sky, but people were using them for terrestrial uses, and even for decorating a home or office. Their numerous ads appeared in periodicals including: Sky and Telescope, Review of Popular Astronomy, and Science Digest.
While the 1950s were prosperous years for Unitron, in 1957 astronomy fever erupted with the launch of the Russian satellite Sputnik. The space race was on, and this drew national interest to space and science. The US space program was in full swing, and from it came real heroes and the country was unified with a national purpose. People and screen writers had imagination; television programs about astronauts, space and a bright future were on in prime time including Outer Limits, Twilight Zone, Lost In Space, My Favorite Martian, The Jetsons cartoon, I Dream of Jeannie, and of course Star Trek. Countless notable personalities including talk show host Johnny Carson, author Arthur C. Clarke, actor Marlon Brando, brought telescopes to the public attention. Even Dr. Wernher Von Braun, one of the preeminent rocket engineers of the 20th century, looked up to the Moon through his Questar 3-½ telescope. All while Unitron prospered.
NASAs Apollo 11 with astronauts Neil A. Armstrong, Michael Collins and Edwin E. Aldrin, Jr. aboard, lifted off from Kennedy Space Centers Launch Complex 39A atop a Saturn V space vehicle at 9:32 AM EDT July 16, 1969 - the first Lunar landing mission. On July 20 their Lunar Landing Module descended onto the Moon touching down at 4:17:40 PM EDT (20:17:40 UTC). Many people around the world paused to share this televised moment live, and many more stayed up to watch Neil Armstrong step off the Lander and onto the Moon at 10:56 PM EDT (2:56 UTC) where he uttered “Thats one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind”; never since then has the world been so similarly united (audio file is .mpeg format 83,968 bytes).
Left: Old Glory salutes the launch of Apollo 11 on July 16, 1969. The image size 5,840 bytes.
Click on image to see an enlarged view (762,206 bytes).
But other events were conspiring to distract America. The war in Vietnam cost so much in the way of lives, injury, and dollars that funding cuts for NASA loomed large. Budget and mission planning including the Mars Rocket, the hoped-for successor to the Saturn V, was stopped, etc. Administrators at NASA were wondering what next as the finality of the last Apollo mission planned for 1972 set in. Executive and Legislative leadership became ineffectual distracted by the Watergate scandal while the US economy was feeling pressure from high spending, trade deficits, rising interest rates and energy costs - and the consumer was starting to feel it too.
The Changing Marketplace
Unitron did not have much time to enjoy the fruits of the growing market since there were ominous signs on the horizon. Among these were an increase of tensions regarding competition and trade issues between the USA and Japan. These came to the limelight in 1969 when President Nixon and Japanese Prime Minister Sato met in Washington, DC on November 19, 20 and 21, to discuss world events and matters of mutual interests to the United States and Japan. The meetings included discussions about trade imbalances and trade liberalization - making Japans markets more accessible for US products; this was not to be the last time these matters would come up so publicly. The discussions closed with an statement where parties agreed to try harder (as usual when US trade representatives meet foreign delegations) to address the large imbalances in trade and payments between the USA and Japan. But more about this later.
By 1970 it seemed as though any store that sold anything was offering some refracting telescopes, and these were nibbling away some of the market share for Unitrons smaller telescopes. One could buy a reasonably well made refracting telescope of up to about 75mm (3 inch) aperture at Montgomery Wards, Sears and Roebuck that bore store brand trade names. One could buy Monolux, Tasco, Jason, Bushnell, Swift, from the increasing number of catalog and chain stores. These telescopes originated in Japan and many were surprisingly well made given their selling price with optical tube assemblies made of metals with glass optical components, often sold in their own wood carrying case too. By the 1980s many of the lower priced telescopes transitioned to cheaper plastic components, some even with cheaply made plastic lenses, cardboard boxes were in and wood cases were history.
Competition from the many Japanese made achromatic refracting telescopes and from makers of other types of telescopes in the USA caused Unitron to gradually reduce their offerings. By 1970 the 1.6 inch Model 127 telescope was discontinued as few people were willing to spend $75 on a telescope this small no matter how well made. This left the 2.4 inch models as the smallest telescopes in the line. In 1970 the Model 114 sold for $125 in 1970, but by December 1972 the price increased dramatically, higher by about 1/3 to $165 for the set.
Some new domestic makers sprung up in Japan too, most notably Takahashi Seisakusho who in 1967 introduced their own TS65 2.6 inch refracting telescope with equatorial mount. Most of the Japanes telescope making companies that appealed to mass merchandisers competing on price disintegrated, leaving no dramatic impact on the market. However, Takahashi and another Japanese manufaturer Vixen Co., Ltd. would by 1977 jump on innovations that resulted from efforts by Nikon and Canon to improve their ultra-telephoto lenses. These companies, along with complacency at Nihon Seiko would ultimately destroy the f/15 makers competitiveness; more about this later too.
Other competing designs prospered too, among these were Newtonian reflecting telescopes most notably the Criterion RV-6, a 6 inch f/8 telescope selling for $194.95, and introduced in October 1970 was the Criterion RV-8 a $399.95 8 inch f/6 telescope. Cave Optical Company was doing a good job of making telescopes that competed for the affections of astronomers who might otherwise buy one of Unitrons larger offerings. Edmund Scientific was moving from selling surplus components and optics to selling new telescope-making parts including mirrors and lenses, and complete telescopes. Of course Questar was still around, one of the few competitors still there since as far back as 1954, but their unique telescopes appealed to a clientele looking for something different than that which Unitron offered.
As images from space and the pace of life quickened through the later 1960s it seemed there was less and less that could be left to the imagination. A glimpse of Saturn appearing with modest details no longer had the impact on a person coming of age then that it might have had for people who grew up in the 1950s or earlier. By 1970 the American public had largely become used to space missions. When the Apollo 17 mission launched on December 7, 1972 this would be the last manned flight to the moon for that century as the originally planned following three missions had been cancelled as funding had been diverted. It is interesting commentary on the state of things when we recall many people telephoned their local television stations to complain when coverage of some Apollo missions interfered with routine programming!
New Competition: In 1977 Takahashi introduced the TS90, a 90mm (3.5 inch) f/11 Apochromatic refracting telescope. The TS90 was the first of a new breed of refracting telescopes* that were within grasp of the more demanding amateur. The doublet objective incorporates a crown element made of pure calcium fluorite, a synthetic grown under laboratory conditions. This design providing unprecedented clarity and freedom from false color (chromatism), and with a focal length nearly 2/3 that of a competing Unitron. This faster f ratio meant the Takahashi was more versatile, easier to transport, and its optical tube assembly could be mated to a lighter weight mount than that required to overcome the moment of the longer Unitron f/15 refractor. In 1981 Takahashi introduced their first 4 inch fluorite Apo, and at an even faster and more compact f/8 - with better performance and nearly half the physical length of a Unitron 4 inch f/15! By the early 1980s Vixen too featured well made fluorite doublet apochromatic telescopes (lens similarly sourced from a Canon subsidiary), most notably the highly regarded Vixen 102FL. This 4 inch f/9 was distributed throughout the Americas by Celestron, this was a notable step in popularizing the Fluorite Apo refracting telescopes.
*Lets not overlook the Carl Zeiss company was there well before the others. By 1886 Zeiss was manufacturing microscope objectives employing calcium fluorite (CaF2) elements. And their subsidiary Schott pioneered the making of high grade synthetic calcium fluorite. However, Zeiss had not really pressed their Apo lens technology into the amateur telescope market - yet.
The worsening condition of the US economy lead to high interest rates. This combined with the energy crises and rising costs during the 1977 to 1981 term of President Jimmy Carter meant there was more and more competition in the USA for fewer sales. As we have observed again after the financial crises of the Wall Street bailouts, the housing bubble burst of the recent years: most people NEED milk and gasoline, they do not need telescopes.
In spite of the changing marketplace Unitron continued to promote the company and astronomy. Jim Mullaney became the consulting staff astronomer for Unitron, helping to keep the product in the forefront while helping their customers progress in the hobby for about a decade. Few other companies of the time could provide before or after sale support like this. This was in part why some people considered Unitron to be the Aston Martin of telescopes.
Not yet appearing to realize how the market was changing, Nihon Seiko introduced new telescopes - yeeeup more ACHROMATIC refracting telescopes: an 8" (200mm) and 225mm (8.86) that were sold by special order. By the time these large refractors came about the product line, as elegant as it has been, was obsolete. Apochromatic refracting telescopes were taking over the traditional refractor market; these newcomers were being made in larger apertures and with much faster focal ratios too. The Apos could be made with physical lengths about half as long and lighter in weight than the Unitron. The compact Apos worked just fine on more compact mounts atop a shorter and more readily accessible tripod or pier. So any money saved by buying the achromat instead of a more costly apochromat OTA was cancelled out by the greater cost of taller stands and heavier mounts needed for the longer achromatic telescopes; this is before moving or housing a large f/15 telescope is factored in.
The shorter focal length Apo telescopes (f/6 and some even faster) provide superior color correction and greater versatility than the f/15 Achromats both for visual and for astrophotographic uses. Just consider an f/7.5 telescope can show four times the area of sky that may be seen through an f/15 system. The response to these technology developments from Nihon Seiko was....nothing really. Even if vendors Unitron and Polarex attempted to bring the changes happening in the market to the attention of management at Nihon Seiko, nothing came of it. Throughout the 1970s and into the 1980s there was no successful effort to develop Apo lens technology, or to source more versatile Apo lenses from third parties. So Nihon Seiko telescopes did not change, Nihon Seiko mounts did not change, the accessories did not change. Instead of working to protect the market they had developed Nihon Seiko elected to continue with what worked for them in the 1950s. In retrospect it seems like Unitron was chopping away, but no chips were flying - they were basically stuck basically offering fine 30 year old technology.
"In retrospect it seems like Unitron was chopping, but no chips were flying - they were stuck basically offering fine 30 year old technology."
Which telescope would you prefer to take out? telescopes scaled to Approx. actual comparative sizes:
OR
Above: Unitrons problem graphically represented: a Model 160 4 inch f/15 Photo-Equatorial telescope with provided mount and tripod (image 32,715 bytes).
Alongside is Vixen 102FL 4 inch f/9 Fluorite Apo telescope shown on Vixen GP equatorial mount and aluminum tripod (retracted), image size 13,789 bytes.
Telescope images are scaled to show the approximate differences in physical size.
Please do not get us wrong, we are not knocking these telescopes for fun. In their day these provided a good value and striking performance on the objects for which they were well suited. We are just trying to keep things in perspective here so that readers do not think they must run out and buy one of these classic dinosaurs without comprehending what they may be getting themselves into.
In an effort to compete better in terms of portability by 1980 Nihon Seiko introduced their Models 131-C (3 inch) and 132-C (4 inch) folded refracting telescopes. In this arrangement an objective lens is attached to the front of a short cylindrical tube assembly, the light from the objective is reflected by two tilted mirrors aligned within the optical tube so that the light cone exits the rear of the telescope. So the 3 inch optical tube for example now was only 19 inches long, about 1/3 the length of the conventional telescope, and 5 inches in diameter. The added complexity and cost of the two precision mirrors inside these folded telescopes however added cost (introduced at just under $700 for the Model 131-C 3 inch equatorial set) and weight to the otherwise simple refractor optical tube. By 1985 the 131-C set cost was $1,078 while the conventional 3 inch equatorial telescope Model 142 sold for $1,298, the difference attributable to the larger German mount provided with the Model 142.
What Company?: Changes of people and organization would be among the critical aspects to impact the company. The original United Trading Company and its descendants changed corporate identities and their locations of offices and distribution numerous times. In 1975 Lawrence Fine, the founder of United Trading Company, sold his interests in the company; he would die tragically two years later. By 1981 Unitron had been sold to Ehrenreich Photo Optical, a photographic equipment distributor. In 1982 Thomas A. Zappetti came to the company, he would control the helm of the Unitron companies through the end of telescope production to see it emerge as a well regarded distributor of microscopes and other instruments.
From 1975 on the Unitron companies distributing these telescopes appeared to change corporate identities as some people change shoes; this can be seen in the records of Corporations held by New York and other states where the respective entities operated. Consider how the company is represented in their literature at our archives:
The Demise
Nihon Seiko continued production even as Unitron was sold to a photographic equipment distributor in 1981. Unitron telescope sales group was no longer an independent entity, they had been relegated to something like a foster child as Unitron saw dollar signs by moving their attention to sales of microscopes and other equipment. Generally speaking the quality of the telescope and mounts was not cheapened over their years of production, though later in production some less obvious cost cutting was apparent to us. Consider their replacing the traditional leather strap provided for decades as case handles with a black flexible plastic strap. The smaller and cheaper latches on the cases of later production models. The UNITRON labels on their cases were originally made of painted high relief stamped metal nailed onto the case, later production models bear a simpler flat painted stick-on label.
In order to have something to sell that was comparable to the lower-priced imported telescopes being marketed through the 1980s, Unitron ordered refracting telescopes of simpler construction. These telescopes were not made by Nihon Seiko, but were made by other vendors and are basically identical to the department store models being sold at the time, and were a far cry from the values that up to then could be expected of the Unitron name. At least some of these were made for Unitron by Towa Optics of Japan. Towa sold telescopes under their tradename and under other trademarks through retailers in the USA, their telescopes included the “Discoverer̶a; line sold by Sears Roebuck. One of these Towa telescopes is a 20 to 90x zoom 60mm achromat on a simple alt-az mount bearing the trade name "UNITRON" on the focuser, and with “UNITRON ED-U-SCOPE™” on the barrel of the telescope optical tube. Trying to cash in on the Comet Halley visit from 1984 to 1985, Unitron imported other less sophisticated telescopes some that made little sense for looking at Comet Halley. These included a 12 to 40x 40mm “Komet Spotter™”; this is among those many small telescopes being marketed then by people who knew nothing about observing comets to people who knew nothing about observing comets.
|
|
Above: Are these examples of Phillistine pig-ignorance, or
of that good old-fashioned American capitalism? (27,364 and 24,152 bytes).
But the items offered in the product line seemed less competitive at the time in the eyes of management at Company Seven that we had no interest in offering the Unitron telescopes even as we rode the crest of Comet Halley visit from 1984 to 1985.
The decline of Japanese dominance in the US market under the administration of President Ronald W. Reagan, high spending in some areas, various exemptions to planned budget cuts and the loss of federal revenue from tax cuts created difficulties in balancing the federal budget. As a result, the government borrowed extensively to pay its bills issuing Bonds and the like. Government debt about tripled from 1980 to 1988. Much of this money came from abroad, especially from Japan. Borrowing money to pay the debt caused the government to spend a greater proportion of its budget on interest payments for loans. The budget deficit kept interest rates so high that the value of the dollar soared in relation to major foreign currencies. Consumer spending for manufactured products grew, but this was mainly spent for inexpensive imports. As a result the United States further increased its foreign debt throughout the 1980s by spending more on imported goods than it earned from exports. The U.S. trade deficit climbed from $24.2 billion in 1980 to $152.7 billion in 1986. By 1986 with James Baker as Treasury Secretary, an effort began to reduce foreign indebtedness, the government devalued the dollar. Devaluation, which lowered the value of the dollar in relation to foreign currency, made American products less expensive and therefore more desirable in foreign markets. During the next few years, the dollar declined in value by over 40% on a trade-weighted basis and encouraged a major revival of US exports. However, devaluation failed to erase the trade deficit.
The devaluation hit at a time when the Dollar to Japanese Yen exchange rates were on the order 238 in 1985.
We would see the steady decline in US buying power accelerate so that by 1988 the exchange rates were at about 128 Yen per dollar!
By 1985 the price of the Unitron Model 114 2.5 inch telescope had increased to $585, this was before the major effects of the devaluation hit. Company Seven observed the price of the highly regarded Japanese made products skyrocketed. The more demanding members our community did not suffer much from the loss of many items since more and more of the better products were coming from innovative US companies. However, the more economical to advanced range of refracting telescopes and equatorial mountings in particular became much more expensive commodities with few available substitutes for similar cost in the USA. This devaluation did have the impact desired initially, we slowed buying Japanese products. But the US companies did not bring back much production to the USA on the whole - they simply looked for countries where things could be made for less than Japan. It is interesting to note that Edmund Scientific then decided to bring the complete manufacturing and assembly of the Edmund Astroscan telescope back to the USA; the result was such a plunge in quality control that Company Seven discontinued selling the popular little telescope!
Just as Japan had been teased for its mimicking of foreign made innovations in the mid to late 1980s, Taiwan and Korea then in the late 1980s China made their entrance onto the world optics markets. The products that would displace Nikon Seiko other Japanese manufacturers on the low to middle range of the markets were coming from Korea, Thailand, China. These imports would for several years to come be among the shoddiest products sold to the uninformed US consumer.
By the late 1980s the Chinese and Korean factories developed telescopes and mounts that so closely copied the external appearance (but not the performance) of competing products where the external resemblance is often so exact that only the paint can differentiate them. Vixen in particular suffered greatly as many of their products were copied in appearance if not performance. By 1988 the pace of manufacturing telescopes had appreciably slowed at Nihon Seiko as demand for Japanese made goods declined. Those who made the better, more sophisticated apochromatic refracting telescopes and accessories in Japan (Takahashi for example) prospered. Some Japanese companies began to shift their own production to overseas thus saving labor and real estate costs, and also avoiding having to deal with more stringent environmental laws taking effect in Japan. Nikon opened a plant in Thailand, Fujinon shifted some production to China; others would follow. The companies making the simpler achromatic refractors in other countries quickly took much of the available market share from Carton, Kenko Co., Ltd., of Vixen, other Japan-based factories and of course Nikon Seiko.
By 1990 Celestron who had been selling capable Vixen telescopes such as the 80mm Alt azimuth Refractor for about $550 was faced by Meade Instruments, their prime competitor, advertising a poorer quality 90mm achromatic telescope made in Korea selling for much than the Celestron (Vixen) 80. As a warning to our customers Company Seven mentioned in our web site "a very good 80mm telescope will outperform a lesser grade of 90mm telescope in many areas of astronomy". However, the typical consumer when poorly counseled and otherwise ignorant of details will usually choose that which appears to be the "best buy", and so the sales of imported Japanese made telescopes plummeted.
By 1992 Unitron was no longer in the telescope business, but continued to sell off remaining telescope and accessories inventory for years afterwards. By the late 1990s a large facility was all that remained, with bits of this or that telescope here and there. By this time most US based manufacturers of good amateur telescopes who operated from the 1950s through the 1970s had gone out of business with the exceptions of Celestron International and Meade Instruments. And neither Celestron or Meade would survive as independent US manufacturing companies beyond 2007. Celestron was sold to a Chinese manufacturer, while Meade exported production to Mexico and China; artifacts of the unfortunate US administrations decisions - remember H. Ross Perots prediction about a Giant Sucking Sound?
There is one noteworthy U.S. company who have endured since 1954, and this is Questar Corporation of New Hope, PA. Known for making the Rolls-Royce of precision compact telescopes, they have endured since 1954 by not tampering much with what makes a Questar great - and by not having to answer to Wall Street.
UNITRON Model 142 Telescope Specifications:
Optical Tube Assembly | German Equatorial Mount with Tripod
|
Objective Lens Aperture |
2.94 inches (74.73 mm) |
Focal Length |
47.24 inches (1200 mm) |
Focal Ratio |
f/16.1 |
Coatings |
MgF2 Anti-reflection |
Optical Tube Length Overall |
48-¾ inches (1,238.25 mm) |
Optical Tube Diameter |
3-2⁄16 inch inner diameter (80.96 mm) |
Focuser |
1.25 inch Dia., Rack & Pinion |
Finder (Standard) |
8x 30mm, inline view |
Telescope OTA Weight |
3.74 lbs. / 1.7 kg. |
UIHEX Wood Case |
7-½ x 7-½ x 2-5/16 inches |
UIHEX Case Weight |
10.3 oz. / 292 g. |
OTA Origin |
Made in Japan |
Mount Head and Tripod Height (top of Saddle at our Latitude) |
63-½ inches (161.3 cm) |
Controls |
Manual Geared |
Return (Decl) |
Spring Loaded Piston |
Clutch (RA & Decl) |
Manual |
Mount with Tripod Weight |
|
Tripod Brace Weight |
|
Basic Telescope & Mount Set Weight |
46 lbs. (20.9 kg.) |
Mount Head Wood Case |
|
Tripod Wood Case |
|
Mount Origin |
Made in Japan |
| |
Additional Reading From Our Unitron Archives:
The Internet continues to evolve and bring the world closer than ever, among the benefits are all the resources that helped one to not only find these telescopes used, or rare parts to make restore them, but also literature. Here are Unitron documents scanned by the host of this site:
|